'Artemis Fowl' by Eoin Colfer

Artemis Fowl 1 and 3 (The Eternity Code), Eoin Colfer (3.0)

I will preface this review by saying these are Young Adult novels. I generally appreciate that genre and those books that respect the ‘Adult’ in that moniker. I found parts of this book series to be clever and funny, but the insertion of various whoopee cushion type instances made it feel farther towards the ‘Young’ side of the genre than I like. The main character, Artemis Fowl, is a pre-teen criminal genius. In the first book he is quite unlikeable – not surprising for a conceited, rich youngster. I did like the addition of the underworld, in this case defined as the place where the magical folk of the world have gone to escape the ‘mudders’, or humans. Artemis tricks someone to find out all the secrets of the Faeires and is determined to steal their gold (as we all know, they have pots of gold). Sadly, you are not rooting for him to win. At least by the end of the first book, he seems to soften and become more likeable. The third book revisits many of the same characters with the introduction of a criminal worse than Artemis. Now that we have an official bad guy, Artemis can be more of an anti-hero, which works better. Not bad for a quick escapist read, but doesn’t compete with many of the YA books as far as depth is concerned.

'Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town' by Jon Krakauer

Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town, Jon Krakauer (3.0)

While I usually enjoy Mr. Krakauer’s books and this topic is extremely important, I did not enjoy reading this book. I felt like I was being bombarded with ‘rape, rape, rape, incompetence, rape, rape, victim shaming, incompetence, legal system let-down, rape, rape.’ I know I only needed to read the details of each rape once for it to be etched into my psyche. Having the examples repeated (sometimes 3 or 4 times) was dulling. Many reviewers of this book remarked that the second half (mostly having to do with the trials) was too dry, but I felt it was needed after all the emotional trauma of the first half. This is a book that should be read, but is very hard to read.

'The Battle for God: A History of Fundamentalism' by Karen Armstrong

The Battle for God: A History of Fundamentalism, Karen Armstrong (3.5)

I learned a lot reading this book in which Ms. Armstrong thoroughly examines the branching of fundamentalism in the three main global religions: Judaism, Islam and Christianity. While the timing is often different, there were many parallels in why and how they emerged. I appreciated that she gives equal time to all three and carefully draws the comparisons, which were numerous. She often discusses the mythos and logos parts of culture and how as logos (mostly as science) advanced, mythos was often pushed aside. The fundamentalists were often disillusioned by a culture, which could not easily accommodate the spiritual. In simple terms, I can agree with this, but she does go back to it too often, in my opinion. Also, much of this book is depressing – such as the fact that progress always seems to be partnered with war as so many cannot deal with any change. My own faith in my fellow humans was often tested in reading this book – are we really that weak and fragile?