The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck (4)
This book could have begun: ‘It was the worst of times,
and it was the worst of times.’ There was no respite from hardship and tragedy
for the Joads, the book’s central family. That being said, this classic, which
describes one family’s escape from the dust bowl in Oklahoma to the imagined
riches of California during the late 1930s, is not entirely a tragedy. Through
a simple family Steinbeck keenly illustrates the determination of a matriarch
to keep her family together and alive. Sometimes it was hard to determine if
they were ignorant or innocent, particularly when the advertisement of the end
of the rainbow (i.e. jobs in California) was obviously a ploy with all evidence
leading to an overabundance of workers for the few jobs available. But it is
more likely that they needed to believe in that future, as there was nothing
left for them in Oklahoma. Steinbeck effectively uses a unique jump cut
narrative where he alternates chapters of the main Joad drama with smaller ones
containing background pertinent to migrants as a group. At first this seemed
awkward, but quickly felt poetic. While it is not likely that one family met
with all the adversity thrown at the Joads, the story brings alive the history of
events during the Depression with colorful characters that have survived the
test of time. I should add that it has a somewhat controversial ending – both when
first written and amongst my friends – though we all agreed it was well worth
reading.
I haven't read this book in over ten years but that style is reminiscent of Dan Brown, whom I rather like.
ReplyDelete